Skip to main content
Perspectives Blog

American Housing Survey Data Show Changes in Multifamily Supply Are Unfavorable to Lower-Income Renters

February 11, 2016

Nuno Mota

The most recent American Housing Survey (AHS) data, for 2013, allow us to estimate the number of multifamily housing units (those in a building with five or more units) that were added and lost since the previous survey in 2011. Replicating the methodology used in the US Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Components of Inventory Change (CINCH) Reports, we estimate that both annual additions and losses from the multifamily housing stock have been trending downward during the 2005-2013 period and were approximately 183,000 and 123,000, respectively, for the latest survey pair (2011-2013).

We show that lower-income renters lost ground in both additions to and losses from the multifamily rental housing stock. An estimated 44,000 units, or 52%, of the approximately 84,000 rental units that were lost annually between 2011 and 2013 were affordable to Very Low Income renters, with a median monthly rent of $600 in 2011 compared with a median rent just under $800 for units remaining in the stock. HUD defines a unit as affordable to Very Low Income renters if the estimated housing cost is not greater than 30% of the income of renters earning 50% of the median income for their locality (Area Median Income, AMI).

By contrast, only 38,000 or roughly one-quarter of the estimated 145,000 annual renter units added were affordable to Very Low Income renters, with a median rent for additions of $1,000 in 2013. These trends show the challenge facing lower-income households that are looking for affordable multifamily rental housing.1 With little new stock affordable to them, many lower-income households are renting apartments that are beyond their financial means, leaving them less money for food, healthcare, transportation to work, and other necessities.

To learn more about the findings, read our latest edition of Housing Insights.


1 Estimates based on AHS survey respondents where information on housing costs is provided to determine affordability and includes renter-occupied as well as seasonal or vacant units.

Nuno Mota
Economist
Economic & Strategic Research

Tatyana Zahalak
Economist
Multifamily Economics and Market Research

February 11, 2016 

Opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views of Fannie Mae's Economic & Strategic Research (ESR) Group included in these materials should not be construed as indicating Fannie Mae's business prospects or expected results, are based on a number of assumptions, and are subject to change without notice. How this information affects Fannie Mae will depend on many factors. Although the ESR Group bases its opinions, analyses, estimates, forecasts, and other views on information it considers reliable, it does not guarantee that the information provided in these materials is accurate, current, or suitable for any particular purpose. Changes in the assumptions or the information underlying these views could produce materially different results. The analyses, opinions, estimates, forecasts, and other views published by the ESR Group represent the views of that group as of the date indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of Fannie Mae or its management.